Sysadmin: what projects the company is actually running

What employees report they're working on and what's actually in their working files almost never match — not out of malice, just because memory is selective and files are objective.

Digercules analyzes data on active employees' computers and structures it by what's actually there: which projects are genuinely underway, who's involved, what's done, what's stalled. Not by folder names, not by self-reports — by content.

How it works

Processing runs either entirely on the client's own hardware, or — if that hardware isn't powerful enough — is delegated to a specific external machine over a closed peer-to-peer channel (not a public cloud): the compute is physically located in the Caucasus and Eastern Europe, the client is always told explicitly which machine and which jurisdiction is doing the processing, and only text/structured results come back — never the source files. Each employee sees only the result for their own data — the company-wide picture is assembled from structured results, not from raw files on a shared server.

Objections

"This looks like employee surveillance" — the goal isn't productivity scoring, it's giving the company an objective map of its projects; the result is a structured content description, not a time or activity report.

"We already have a task tracker" — a task tracker records what people manually entered into it; Digercules sees what's actually on disk, including work that never made it into the tracker.

First contact

A pilot on 2–3 employees from one department — comparing what the tracker shows against what real file analysis shows. The decision on a pilot like this sits with an IT lead or director, not a line sysadmin — that's who should see the comparison.